Solving New Jersey's
College Affordability, Capacity and
Public Accountability Challenges
State College/University Legislative
Priorities
2008-2009
Refine the NJ STARS II Scholarship
Program
Under the NJ STARS II program, established in
2006, NJ STARS I students who graduate from community college with a 3.0 average
can continue to get free tuition and fees at a four-year state college.
But the state provides a scholarship of only $4,000 per year, and if the student
is not eligible for federal or state financial aid, the college or university
must make up the entire difference in cost.
The students who are benefiting from the NJ STARS
II program are increasingly from families who are ineligible for needs-based
grants. At the Richard Stockton College of New Jersey, for example, the
average income of NJ STARS II families currently is $96,000.
As the NJ STARS program continues to grow, costs
are dramatically increasing for both the institutions and the state.
Unless the program is changed, it will cost institutions millions of dollars in
FY 2009.
It is ASCU's position that the NJ STARS II
program should help the student achievers without creating a financial drain at
the senior public colleges and universities. If a student is not eligible
for additional financial aid, the institution should not be obligated to make up
the difference in cost.
Increase Flexibility in the
Selection of Trustees
Since 2000, the state colleges and universities
have been authorized to have up to three out-of-state residents serve as
trustees, provided they are alumni of the institution. As the state
colleges and universities continue to mature and attract support from across the
country, there should be more flexibility in the choice of board members.
Assembly Bill No. 636 (sponsored by Assemblywoman
Lampitt), an ASCU priority, would provide that of the three non-state
residents who may serve on the board of trustees of the nine state colleges and
universities, only one is
required to be an alumnus or alumna of the institution.
Increase Facilities Construction Flexibility;
Allow Design-Build Contracts
The State College Contracts Law (N.J.S.A.
18A:64-52 et seq.) restricts the ability of the state colleges and
universities to enter construction contracts that are innovative and
cost-effective. Under current law (N.J.S.A. 18A:64-76.1), the institutions
typically commission an architect or engineer to prepare drawings and
specifications under a design contract. The institutions then select a
construction contractor to build the facility. Costs can increase because
of change orders derived from errors and omissions as the project moves from
design to construction.
It is ASCU's position that the state colleges and
universities should be able to enter design-build contracts, under which a
single entity performs both architectural/engineering services and construction
under one contract. The design-build method has many advantages regarding
cost containment, risk management, and timely completion of projects.
Enact Workers' Compensation Reform
Making State
Colleges and Universities Independent of Treasury's Bureau of Risk Management
Treasury's Bureau of Risk Management administers
the state colleges' and universities' workers' compensation claims, and the
Attorney General represents the institutions before the workers' compensation
court. The Bureau charges the institutions quarterly for money paid by the
state to administer their workers' compensation claims. These payments,
along with Sick Leave Injury payments, have continuously escalated and have
become a serious financial concern.
The state colleges and universities have
insufficient administrative control over this system. Moreover, the
institutions often receive insufficient information about their workers'
compensation claims.
Consistent with the autonomy granted since 1986
over fiscal and personnel matters, it is ASCU's position that the state colleges
and universities should be allowed to manage their own workers' compensation
program through a risk management fund modeled on the one established by the
county colleges in 1985. The institutions would obtain necessary services
while minimizing their expenses, and the state would no longer need to
administer the state colleges' and universities' claims.
Enact a Higher Education Facilities Bond
Referendum for Voter Approval
The state colleges and universities join with the
other senior public universities, community colleges and independent colleges
and universities to request that the governor and legislature enact legislation
as soon as possible to provide for a $2.7 billion higher education facilities
bond, for voter approval in November 2008. The bond is an extremely
important strategic investment for New Jersey to achieve our opportunity,
workforce, economic, prosperity, and competitiveness agenda.
Assemblyman Greenwald has introduced a bill to
authorize the bond program, Assembly Bill No. 730, an ASCU number one priority.
Justification for the bond includes unprecedented
demand, inadequate current capacity, and $5.8 billion statewide in capital
needs. Not since 1988, has there been a general obligation bond for
all the state's higher education facilities needs.
A record number of applicants are knocking on the
doors of New Jersey's colleges and universities. Between 2003-2004 and
2016-2017, the number of high school graduates in New Jersey is projected to
increase by 19.1%, the 8th-highest increase in the nation. New Jersey has
the highest percentage of high school students graduating in four years, and the
highest percentage attending college immediately after graduation.
Too many of these students leave New Jersey to
pursue a college education and are lost permanently to New Jersey's
workforce. New Jersey is the nation's leading net-exporter of high school
graduates entering college, totaling over 26,000 students each year.
Total undergraduate and graduate enrollment in
New Jersey is projected to increase between 50,000 and 54,000 between 2002 and
2010 simply based on growth in college-going population. New Jersey is
wholly unprepared to meet this demand. New Jersey's four-year public
institutions would need to expand by 70,000 students to reach the national mean
in students served per capita.
Reauthorize Revolving Funds for
Campus Infrastructure Needs
There is currently over $500 million in critical
infrastructure needs at senior public institutions.
Bond funds for New Jersey (senior) public
institutions approved almost 15 years ago were intended to be revolving funds,
and they should be renewed:
In the 2004-2005 legislative session, Senate Bill
No. 1928 would have renewed HEFT and increased the amount of the funds to $350
million. A similar bill should be enacted.
Make Accountability Improvements,
But Not a Big Bureaucracy
Legislation such as Senate Bill No. 148 follow up
on recommendations made by the State Commission of Investigation last
fall. The state colleges and universities oppose this bill, but have
prepared a detailed outline of accountability measures already in place and
improvements that can be accomplished without additional legislation or
regulation. Recent legislation, Assembly Bill No. 2407, more closely
reflects what ASCU believes would ensure greater accountability and address
legislative concerns without entailing regression to bureaucratic control and
its higher costs.
Fundamentally, the state colleges' and
universities' suggested approach includes implementing Sarbanes-Oxley best
practices and strengthening the appointment and support for effective boards of
trustees.
Restore Higher Education Incentive Funding
The Higher Education Incentive Endowment Program
was established in September 1999 to build partnerships between private business
leaders and New Jersey's colleges and universities. Under the program, the
state provides matching dollars for significant donations and endowment
contributions. The state's institutions of higher education and their
students greatly benefit from this program. Four-year public colleges and
universities receive a 100% match over 10 years for endowment contributions of
at least $1 million, and a 10% match for donations of at least $1 million.
Two-year colleges and independent colleges and universities also receive
benefits for securing significant endowment contributions and donations.
Institutions receiving Higher Education Incentive funds earmark them to help
stabilize tuition and provide scholarships, attract talented faculty, and build
new classrooms and research facilities.
Funding for this program has been significantly
curtailed over the past five years. ASCU supports restoring this program
with its added benefit of helping public institutions help themselves in
fundraising and expanding their endowments.