New Jersey Association of

State Colleges and Universities
committed to college opportunity for new jersey citizens

150 West State Street, Trenton, New Jersey 08608                       609-989-1100     609-989-7017 fax                   njascu@njascu.org

 

Access to College for Low-Income Students Material to NJ's Future

Paul R. Shelly, Director of Communications & Marketing

 

Trenton Times

January 24, 2007

 

According to the National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education, "With few exceptions it is now critical for individuals to attain some level of education beyond high school in order to experience a middle-class lifestyle and for the states in which they live to compete in the global economy."

With that in mind, it is nice to know that, based on U.S. Pell Grant data from 2004, New Jersey ranks first in the nation in college participation rates for students from low-income families.

That is good, but not enough to secure the future of New Jersey, or any other state.  Here are reasons for concern:

Many students are in the educational pipeline, including a greater portion of students from low-income families.  The U.S. Department of Education predicts a 25 percent increase in the number of college students over the 1995-2013 time period, almost 4 million more.  Of these additional students (i.e. beyond the 1995 racial/ethnic distribution) 80 percent will be minorities, many from low-income families.

There is still a gap between low-income and high-income student participation in college.  The percentage of low-income high school students who attend college within two years of graduation has improved from 46 percent in 1970 to 57 percent in 2005.  But the percentage of high-income students has gone from 79 percent to 86 percent - leaving the low-/high-income gap similar notes a policy paper by the Association of Governing Boards of Colleges and Universities.

Government policy moves at the federal and state levels threaten opportunity, including less emphasis on aid to students with greater financial need, less state aid available to cover rising college costs (including price increases directly tied to budget cuts), and a federal shift away from grants toward loans.  With debt burdens mounting, as they had toward graduation, students of limited means are at higher risk of dropping out.

While New Jersey, to its credit is a national leader in need-based financial aid, it trails far behind most states in four-year public college/university enrollment capacity.  Therefore, although affordable education at a public baccalaureate institution with a distinguished complement of full-time professors is within reach, institutions cannot accommodate all applicants, low-income or otherwise.

As the recent New Jersey Policy Perspective Report, "Flunking Out" by Mary E. Forsberg and Anastasia R. Mann puts it, "with an explosive increase in college-age New Jerseyans predicted, the state's current level of higher education funding assures that public and private institutions will fall short of accommodating the demand."

There are solutions to the problems of low-8income student access to college and persistence through graduation.  For example, The Institute for Higher Education Policy, a Washington, D.C., policy advocacy group suggests three steps:

focus resources on students who need them most - those who would otherwise not complete college;

offer rewards to institutions that broaden access and increase student success; and

expand already successful programs.

Advocates from all sectors need to work harder to tell state policymakers about the adverse effects on low-income students of budget cuts and the consequences of failure to expand public college capacity.  Funding cuts, in particular, have been called the "silent killer" of low-income and minority enrollments.

While gaining access to college is key, once students enter college, they need to finish.  Pressure to pay for college contributes to low-income student dropout rates.  But if these students can stay in school and graduate with the help of financial aid, they will be better prepared for the requirements of the region's work force.

Today's successful firms depend on a robust supply of well-qualified students.  A statewide survey of 300 employers in July 2006 by Rutgers University's Heldrich Center observed "concern about the quality of their work force outpaces concerns over health insurance costs, taxes and other matters..."

Because New Jersey lacks the capacity to educate all of its students with the required higher education to fill job openings here, business firms continue to actively recruit educated people from elsewhere.  Illustrating this point, a recent New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority annual report cites migration into the state of "45,000 individuals, with baccalaureate degrees or higher, between the years 1995 and 2000."  High costs here, including housing costs and local taxes, could make this importation a tougher go in years ahead.

By investing in our public colleges and universities, New Jersey can embrace the opportunity to serve more low- and middle-income students while broadening the work-force pipeline.  The benefits: a financially sound future for homegrown citizens; more robust communities; less need to import talent; and a more economically sound Garden State.  Our future could rest with the thousands of students of modest means who, at this very moment, are pondering whether they can go to college in New Jersey and afford the costs.

 
For technical questions or comments on the website, please contact our webmaster.
Copyright 2003-2008, NJ Association of State Colleges & Universities.
This page was last updated on Tuesday, April 24, 2007