Association Staff
Directors


Michael W. Klein, JD, PhD
Chief Executive Officer
mwklein@njascu.org

Barbara Berreski, Esq.
Government & Legal Affairs
bberreski@njascu.org

Paul R. Shelly
Communications & Marketing
prshelly@njascu.org

Wendy A. Lang
Programs & Policy Initiatives
walang@njascu.org

Support Staff:

Patricia A. Stearman
Budget & Administration
pastearman@njascu.org

Charlene R. Pipher
Executive Assistant
crpipher@njascu.org

Theresa M. Toth
Secretary
tmtoth@njascu.org
Contact Info
New Jersey Association of State Colleges and Universities
150 West State Street
Trenton, New Jersey 08608
Email: info@njascu.org

Phone: (609) 989-1100
Fax: (609) 989-7017

2011 Public Opinion Polling

Voters See Public Colleges and a Priority Investment Linked to Jobs and Future Prosperity, But Don't See a State Plan

NJ likely voters say state colleges and universities are key to economic recovery, merit more state investment to fulfill this role, and are trusted to make educational and financial decisions.  However, these public institutions need to do more to show the public they are working hard to contain costs and keep tuition affordable -- a big concern of Jersey residents, many of whom have experienced economic setbacks.  Read press here See poll results.


 

Poll indicates a New Jersey "disconnect":  Voters See Public Colleges as a Priority Investment Linked to Jobs and Future Prosperity, But Don't See a State Plan

According to a new, scientific public opinion survey by Penn, Schoen & Berland Associates (PSB), Washington, DC, office for New Jersey Association of State Colleges and Universities (NJASCU) the state's likely voters say that New Jersey's state colleges and universities are key to economic recovery, merit more state investment to fulfill this role, and are trusted to make educational and financial decisions.  However, the polls show that these public institutions need to do more to demonstrate that they are working hard to contain costs and keep tuition and fees affordable -- a big concern of Jersey residents, many of whom have experienced economic setbacks.

The results are taken from an online study, focusing squarely on New Jersey's nine state colleges and universities, conducted by PSB March 31 - April 4, 2011 of 750 New Jersey likely voters.  The margin of error for this study is plus/minus 3.58% at the 95% confidence level.

College investment tied with jobs, economic development.  The vast majority (95%) of likely voters think it is important for the state to have a plan to connect higher education with jobs and the economy.  A 57% majority said they were not aware that the state has such a plan.

Most residents seem to understand the need to invest in higher education. Among likely voters, 57% strongly agree that excellent and affordable state colleges are vital to New Jersey's economy.  More than 60% say they are likely to support investment in college and university facilities, including a bond issue of $1.3 billion or $2.6 billion.  Better than four out of five likely voters agree -- and 39% strongly agree -- that the state should provide consistent, predictable support to state colleges and universities so they can make long-term plans.

Colleges viewed as high quality, but affordability concerns deepen.  According to Dr. Darryl Greer, NJASCU's CEO, affordability is an especially big concern because people don't want to be locked out of state colleges by their economic circumstances.  Citizens recognize the education at state colleges and universities is of high quality:  14% say quality is excellent, 67% say good, 17% say fair, and 1% say poor.

Likely voters were divided about the affordability of state colleges; citizens' perception that college remains affordable continues to slip in the bad economy.  In the current poll, 51% say the colleges are not affordable (not very + not at all), while 42% say colleges are somewhat affordable, and 7% say the colleges are very affordable.  By comparison, in 2007, 16% of residents said state colleges were not affordable.

Greer says that the perception of college affordability is shaped by several factors:  estimations of costs and student aid to cover costs; awareness of the pace of increases over time; and changes in personal economic circumstances.

The poll found that about one-half (51%) of likely voters had experienced at least one personal setback (e.g., job loss, pay cut, reduced hours) over the past year.  Greer added, "While citizens are basically correct about the rising cost of college, they do tend to overestimate the cost, sometimes by 50% or more."

Many of those surveyed (38%) accurately responded the current state college tuition and fees rate range (above $10,000 but below $15,000), although approximately the same share think that tuition is above $15,000.  (Note:  the question specified "excluding room and board").  While citizens support helping others through student financial aid, 38% of likely voters think financial aid to those at NJ state colleges benefits "people like me and my family."  A majority (62%) respond that such programs "benefit others but not me and my family."

Beyond state investment, productivity is key to affordability.  While the colleges have been cutting costs, improving productivity, and finding new revenue to supplement lost state funds, much of the public may be unaware of these efforts.  Twenty-two percent (22%) of likely voters say that the main reason for tuition increases is colleges' inability to cut back on spending.  A large segment of the public cites state budget cuts as the chief reason for tuition increases (32%).

Confidence in trustees is strong.  Most likely voters favor giving college trustee boards, rather than the legislature or state agencies, the freedom and responsibility to manage personnel, operations and programs.  Four out of five believe that more Trenton control will lead to more political interference.

As in past PSB polls, citizens are far more likely to trust college presidents and the nonpartisan trustee boards than state bodies and agencies to make the best decisions for institutions.  For example, when it comes to decisions about planning and facilities construction, trustee boards are favored over state entities nearly 2:1, and they are favored 3:1 when it comes to decisions regarding managing employees.

Scholarships should not restrict choice.  The public is not at all keen about state student financial aid programs that are limited to one type of New Jersey college.  Seven out of ten likely voters say that state-funded scholarships should be available to students attending any New Jersey college or university.  Another 21% say scholarships should be limited to those attending four-year colleges, and 9% say they should be limited to those attending county/community colleges.

Capacity problem understood.  Better than four out of ten (42%) of likely voters are aware that New Jersey state colleges have to turn away students.  Several of the questions showed that a majority of residents favor investing in state colleges and universities to serve more New Jerseyans.  Darryl Greer says he believes that the shortage of state college first-time, full-time freshmen slots (currently only about 11,000 for over 20,000 applicants) is being felt in many homes.  The capacity problem persists despite the fact that the colleges are now enrolling, collectively, about 17,500 more full-time students than they did a decade ago, and Thomas Edison State College continues to grow by thousands of students as the leading college serving adult learners attending part-time.

Low support for in-state tuition for undocumented students.  The public has moved, over the past six years, toward a less favorable view of granting in-state tuition rates to undocumented, but otherwise qualified, New Jersey students:  62% say no, 38% say yes.  In the 2005 PSB poll for NJASCU, opinion was split:  46% said yes, 45% said no.

Other questions covered in the poll include factors contributing to student graduation rates, perceptions about spending on higher education compared to spending on K-12 education, and importance of addressing New Jersey's (nation's worst) loss of high school graduates to out-of-state institutions (net 30,000 per year).

To see results of 2011 poll, click here.

2009 Public Opinion Polling

The New Jersey Association of State Colleges and Universities (ASCU) sponsored a poll conducted between September 30 and October 5, 2009 by Washington, DC-based Penn, Schoen & Berland Associates.  The poll consisted of online interviews about New Jersey's nine state colleges and universities, conducted with 671 likely gubernatorial election voters in New Jersey.  The margin of error for the entire sample is +/- 3.78 at the 95% confidence level.

 

On the importance of, and quality of, education at New Jersey state colleges and universities.

n 86% said the colleges are important to keeping good jobs in New Jersey (44% very important; 42% somewhat important);
n 79% said the colleges are important to keeping NJ families in New Jersey (37% very important; 42% important);
n 91% said they have a favorable view of the NJ state colleges and universities (32% very favorable; 59% somewhat favorable);
n Very favorable ratings were 37% among those with children under 25.
n 82% said the nine New Jersey state colleges and universities (The College of New Jersey, Kean University, Montclair State University, New Jersey City University, Ramapo College of New Jersey, Richard Stockton College of New Jersey, Rowan University, Thomas Edison State College and William Paterson University) do a good or excellent job at providing education to students (18% excellent; 64% good).

Control over colleges, accountability and trust.  More than four out of five (81%) agree that less government bureaucracy and less state regulation would help the colleges and universities be more efficient and serve more students.

 

Nearly four out of five (79%) agree that if the state is going to invest more money to support higher education and serve more New Jersey students, nonpartisan boards of trustees and the presidents should make the decision, as opposed to "letting the governor decide how to spend the money" (11%), or "letting state agencies in Trenton decide how to spend the money"
(10%).

 

Similarly, seven out of ten (71%) say that, when it comes to future progress on college affordability, quality and accountability, they trust state college/university presidents and their nonpartisan trustee boards, as opposed to the governor (12%) or legislature (7%).

 

A majority of likely voters think that if Trenton had more control over state colleges and universities the result would be less, not greater, college opportunity (56% said less; 44% said greater).  On the question of whether more Trenton control would make state colleges subject to less or more political interference, a large majority (87%) agreed that it would make them more subject to such interference.

 

Student enrollment and capacity, ties to the economy.  Many likely voters mistakenly think that state colleges serve large numbers of out-of-state residents.  Only 16% said they thought the colleges enroll fewer than 10% out-of-state students -- which is the case.  39% said the percentage of out-of-state students was 11-20%; 33% said it was 21-30%; 12% said it is 31% or more; 2% think it is 41% or more.

 

Likely voters support the need to expand college capacity:  92% agree that NJ students should have the opportunity to live on campus at the state college or university of their choice; 82% agree that expanding capacity will help keep NJ's brightest students here; 86% agree that expanding college access will help create new jobs and businesses and expand NJ's economy.

 

College affordability and tuition trend lines, causes.  Likely voters are split about whether the cost of education at the nine state colleges is affordable.  Very affordable was listed by 9%; somewhat affordable 43%; not very affordable 38%; and not at all affordable 10%.

 

Likely voters do not hold colleges responsible for tuition increases.  45% think it is the bad economy and state budget cuts; 19% attribute it to rising costs of new programs and technology; another 19% believe the cause is state mandated costs and regulation.  Only 18% believe that it is the inability of colleges to cut back on spending.

 

Financial aid.  41% indicate that financial aid for students at state colleges and universities is available to most students; 59% say that it is not.

 

70% say financial aid "benefits others, but not me and my family;" while 31% say financial aid "benefits people like me and my family."

 

Need for state investment.  When asked whether the current NJ funding for a college student (about half what is spent per student in K-12) is appropriate, only about one-third surveyed (34%) agreed.  Two-thirds (66%) think that spending on college students should be greater than it is now.

 

Similarly, when asked whether the state should have a plan to invest in higher education facilities (it currently has none), in light of the state's current investment of $3.9 billion in K-12 construction, 77% of likely voters agreed that the state should plan to spend somewhere between $1.3 and $3.9 billion on higher education facilities over the next decade.

 

 Too see results of poll, click here.


Poll Results - ASCU-sponsored polls by Penn, Schoen & Berland Associates

2005

2007

2009

2011