Association Staff
Directors


Darryl G. Greer, Ph.D.

Chief Executive Officer
 dggreer@njascu.org
---
Paul R. Shelly
Communications & Marketing prshelly@njascu.org
---
Michael W. Klein
Government & Legal Affairs mwklein@njascu.org
---
Wendy A. Lang
Programs & Policy Initiatives
walang@njascu.org

Support Staff
Patricia A. Stearman
Budget & Administration  pastearman@njascu.org
---
Charlene R. Pipher

Executive Assistant
crpipher@njascu.org
---
Theresa M. Toth
Secretary
tmtoth@njascu.org

 

 

2009 Public Opinion Polling

The New Jersey Association of State Colleges and Universities (ASCU) sponsored a poll conducted between September 30 and October 5 by Washington, DC-based Penn, Schoen & Berland Associates.  The poll consisted of online interviewed about New Jersey's nine state colleges and universities, conducted with 671 likely gubernatorial election voters in New Jersey.  The margin of error for the entire sample is +/- 3.78 at the 95% confidence level.

 

On the importance of, and quality of, education at New Jersey state colleges and universities.

  • 86% said the colleges are important to keeping good jobs in New Jersey (44% very important; 42% somewhat important);

  • 79% said the colleges are important to keeping NJ families in New Jersey (37% very important; 42% important);

  • 91% said they have a favorable view of the NJ state colleges and universities (32% very favorable; 59% somewhat favorable);

  • Very favorable ratings were 37% among those with children under 25.

  • 82% said the nine New Jersey state colleges and universities (The College of New Jersey, Kean University, Montclair State University, New Jersey City University, Ramapo College of New Jersey, Richard Stockton College of New Jersey, Rowan University, Thomas Edison State College and William Paterson University) do a good or excellent job at providing education to students (18% excellent; 64% good).

Control over colleges, accountability and trust.  More than four out of five (81%) agree that less government bureaucracy and less state regulation would help the colleges and universities be more efficient and serve more students.

 

Nearly four out of five (79%) agree that if the state is going to invest more money to support higher education and serve more New Jersey students, nonpartisan boards of trustees and the presidents should make the decision, as opposed to "letting the governor decide how to spend the money" (11%), or "letting state agencies in Trenton decide how to spend the money" (10%).

 

Similarly, seven out of ten (71%) say that, when it comes to future progress on college affordability, quality and accountability, they trust state college/university presidents and their nonpartisan trustee boards, as opposed to the governor (12%) or legislature (7%).

 

A majority of likely voters think that if Trenton had more control over state colleges and universities the result would be less, not greater, college opportunity (56% said less; 44% said greater).  On the question of whether more Trenton control would make state colleges subject to less or more political interference, a large majority (87%) agreed that it would make them more subject to such interference.

 

Student enrollment and capacity, ties to the economy.  Many likely voters mistakenly think that state colleges serve large numbers of out-of-state residents.  Only 16% said they thought the colleges enroll fewer than 10% out-of-state students -- which is the case.  39% said the percentage of out-of-state students was 11-20%; 33% said it was 21-30%; 12% said it is 31% or more; 2% think it is 41% or more.

 

Likely voters support the need to expand college capacity:  92% agree that NJ students should have the opportunity to live on campus at the state college or university of their choice; 82% agree that expanding capacity will help keep NJ's brightest students here; 86% agree that expanding college access will help create new jobs and businesses and expand NJ's economy.

 

College affordability and tuition trend lines, causes.  Likely voters are split about whether the cost of education at the nine state colleges is affordable.  Very affordable was listed by 9%; somewhat affordable 43%; not very affordable 38%; and not at all affordable 10%.

 

Likely voters do not hold colleges responsible for tuition increases.  45% think it is the bad economy and state budget cuts; 19% attribute it to rising costs of new programs and technology; another 19% believe the cause is state mandated costs and regulation.  Only 18% believe that it is the inability of colleges to cut back on spending.

 

Financial aid.  41% indicate that financial aid for students at state colleges and universities is available to most students; 59% say that it is not.

 

70% say financial aid "benefits others, but not me and my family;" while 31% say financial aid "benefits people like me and my family."

 

Need for state investment.  When asked whether the current NJ funding for a college student (about half what is spent per student in K-12) is appropriate, only about one-third surveyed (34%) agreed.  Two-thirds (66%) think that spending on college students should be greater than it is now.

 

Similarly, when asked whether the state should have a plan to invest in higher education facilities (it currently has none), in light of the state's current investment of $3.9 billion in K-12 construction, 77% of likely voters agreed that the state should plan to spend somewhere between $1.3 and $3.9 billion on higher education facilities over the next decade.

 

 

Too see results of poll, click here.

2007 Public Opinion Polling

Seven out of ten New Jersey likely voters say state colleges deliver a good or excellent education, according to an ASCU-sponsored Penn, Schoen & Berland Associates poll, conducted in May 2007.  However, many said they were not convinced that the state colleges and universities are affordable:  51% say they are but 36% say they are not.

Voters also said state colleges deliver high value for the dollar invested.  Greater than six out of ten (63%) said they deliver more value than private colleges and universities.   

The telephone poll consisted of interviews with 655 likely voters.  The margin of error is plus or minus 3.83 at the 95% confidence level (larger for subgroups).

The poll also revealed that New Jersey residents may be getting much more out of the investment in state colleges and universities than they realize.  Less than one out of six of those polled correctly responded that over 90% of the institutions' students are state residents.

Affordability Trend Tied to State Funding, Personnel Costs. 

Nearly 60% of likely voters said that college is less affordable than it was 2-3 years ago.  When asked about the primary cause, the most frequent response was "cuts in state funding."  Other common responses included faculty, staff and administrative salaries and increased spending in other areas, such as technology.

The poll also did not indicate any clear mandate for some cost cutting measures at state colleges.  Asked separately about each of these ideas, only 21% strongly supported using more part-time faculty and fewer full-time faculty; only 19% strongly supported "not improving campus facilities as often," and only 19% strongly supported allowing larger classes.

Voters See Room for Improvement in Spending.

One of the goals of the poll was to ascertain whether the image of the state colleges and universities has been tarnished by various state scandals and allegations of corruption.  Better than six out of ten (61%) likely voters said the institutions are well managed, and only 18% said they are not well managed.

Nonpartisan Board Control is Favored.

While expressing concerns about public college and university accountability, likely voters said greater involvement by Trenton will result in more, not less, political intrusion by a margin greater than 5:1.  They wer also more likely to select nonpartisan trustee boards over state agencies when it comes to higher education spending: when asked whom they would entrust with spending new funds wisely, they selected nonpartisan trustee boards over state agencies by an 8:1 margin, and over the governor and legislature by a 6:1 margin.

Capacity Concerns

Asked about support for more dorms: 60% said this is an "important" matter, including 21% who thought it a "very important" matter. 

The Association is sharing the information about voter views as part of a broad-based effort to promote New Jersey College Promise across the state.

 

2005 Public Opinion Polling

Two surveys conducted for ASCU in 2005 by the Washington, DC office of Penn, Schoen & Berland Associates have concluded that New Jersey voters favor a $2-3 billion higher education bond referendum to provide more college opportunity.  Seven of ten said they trust institutions' governing boards to decide how to best use bond funds.

They strongly agreed that it is important for the State of New Jersey to provide more higher education opportunity for students from low and middle income families, attract more of the state's best students, and provide top-notch academic facilities.

Poll Results - ASCU-sponsored polls by Penn, Schoen & Berland Associates

2005

2007

2009

 

150 West State Street, Trenton, NJ 08608 | (609) 989.1100 | njascu@njascu.org